Welcome to my Sociology 201 blog!

NVCC Sociology Fall 2010 semester. Check back for postings and assignments.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Extra Post: "Family's Fall from Affluence Is Swift and Hard"

Article about a family that rises from working- to upper- back to working-class in the span of a decade.  I don't know that I could handle such a meteoric rise and fall. What strikes me most is the regret they harbor most: it's for their children's lost opportunities.
by Geraldine Fabrikant
Monday, November 29, 2010
http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/111434/familys-fall-from-affluence-is-swift-and-hard
Grateful to have found work in this tough economy, Nick Martin teaches grape growing and winemaking each Saturday to a class of seven students in a simple metal building here at a satellite campus of Highland Community College.
Then he drives 14 miles in an 11-year-old Ford Explorer to a sparsely furnished tract house that he rents for $900 a month on a dead-end street in McFarland, a smaller town. Just across the backyard is a shed that a neighbor uses to make cartridges for shooting the prairie dogs that infest the adjacent fields.
It is a far cry from the life that Mr. Martin and his family enjoyed until recently at their Adirondacks waterfront camp at Tupper Lake, N.Y. Their garage held three stylish cars, including a yellow Aston Martin; they owned three horses, one that cost $173,000; and Mr. Martin treated his wife, Kate, to a birthday weekend at the Waldorf-Astoria, with dinner at the "21" Club and a $7,000 mink coat.
That luxurious world was fueled by a check Mr. Martin received in 1998 for $14 million, his share of the $600 million sale of Martin Media, an outdoor advertising business begun by his father in California in the 1950s. After taxes, he kept about $10 million.
But as so often happens to those lucky enough to realize the American dream of sudden riches, the money slipped through the Martins' fingers faster than they ever imagined.
They faced temptations to indulge, with the complexities and pressures of new wealth. And a pounding recession pummeled the value of their real estate and new financial investments, rendering their properties unaffordable.
The fortune evaporated in little more than a decade.
While many millions of Americans have suffered through this recession with only unemployment benefits to sustain them, Mr. Martin has reason to give thanks — he has landed a job at 59, however far away. He also had assets to sell to help tide his family over.
Still, Mr. Martin, a strapping man with a disarming bluntness, seemed dazed by it all. "We are basically broke," he said.
Though he faulted the conventional wisdom of investing in stocks and real estate for some of his woes, along with poor financial advice, he accepted much of the blame himself.
"We spent too much," he conceded. "I have a fourth grader, an eighth grader and a girl who just finished high school. I should have kept working and put the money in bonds."
Mrs. Martin recalled the summer night in 1998 when the family was having a spaghetti dinner at home in Paso Robles, in central California, and a bank representative called to ask where to wire the money. "It seemed like an unbelievable amount," she said regretfully.
Soon after the money arrived, the family decided to leave Paso Robles, amid some lingering tensions that Mr. Martin felt with his brother and brother-in law, who had run the business. Mr. Martin had never been in management at the billboard company, though he had been on the board and worked at Martin Brothers Winery, another family business.
First, the Martins bought a house in Somerset, England, near the home of Mrs. Martin's parents, and he decided to write a novel. At about the same time, they spent $250,000 on the 3.5-acre camp with four structures on Tupper Lake, deep in the Adirondacks, as a summer home. They began extensive renovations at the lake, adding a stunning three-story boathouse and two other buildings.
Clouds gathered quickly. Life in England turned sour when Mr. Martin's novel, "Anthony: Conniver's Lament," did not sell, and the family's living costs — school fees, taxes and even advice for filing tax returns — swelled. In 2002, fed up with England, the Martins chose a new base, Vermont, and plunked down about $650,000 for a home there, as renovations continued on the Tupper Lake property.
By March 2007, the Martins were determined to move to the lake full time.
They managed their expenses for a while, but the costs mounted and mounted some more as they worked at refurbishing the Adirondack property — eventually totaling a staggering $5.3 million, Mr. Martin said. He poured another $600,000 into the Vermont property, he said.
He vacillates between blaming the builders and blaming himself for letting costs get out of hand. "We should have built something quite modest," he conceded.
Tensions rose in 2007 as summer came without any offers for the Vermont home.
"I thought that housing was going into a tailspin," he said. "I had the feeling that something bad was happening."
So "we started selling cars, shotguns, antique furniture, whatever," Mr. Martin said. The Aston Martin fetched $395,000. With a big gap in his employment history, he found a job teaching English at Paul Smith's College near his home in Tupper Lake for $14,000 a year. For an additional $7,000, he coached the school's cross-country runners.
Then came the financial crisis. The markets plunged, as did the value of the Martins' trust. By fall 2008, with much of the family's net worth tied up in housing, Mr. Martin faced a series of margin calls. He needed more cash in his brokerage accounts because he had been tapping into a credit line with his investments as collateral. In January 2009, he cashed in a retirement account worth roughly $91,000.
The houses could not be sold quickly. Though if they had been, some of the pressure would have lifted. "To maintain those things, you have to have a pretty good cash flow," Mr. Martin said.
The family ultimately put the Adirondacks property on the market for $4.9 million, then quickly slashed the price by half. Last month, the Martins got an offer for just half of the latest $2.5 million asking price.
They have stopped making payments on their $1.1 million mortgage and their $53,000 in annual property taxes in the Adirondacks as well as the mortgage and taxes on their Vermont home. They cannot afford those obligations on Mr. Martin's current salary of $51,000. Their household income is down from $250,000 four years ago.
At the moment, they are working with a loan modification unit at their bank. The lender proposed a new payment of $3,550 a month, reduced from $7,400. Given his current status, Mr. Martin argued, that it does not make much sense. He predicts that the house will ultimately be sold or taken over by the bank. Meanwhile, for the Christmas holidays and some of next summer, the family has found renters for the main house to help cover some of the costs.
Over lunch recently at Barleycorn's Downtown Bar and Deli in Wamego, Mr. Martin said he believed "the worst is behind us."
Perhaps. But a forced restructuring can be difficult for children and spouses even in longstanding marriages.
Sometimes he and his wife took it out on each other, he said. "She bought a bunch of horses. I blamed her for the horses. I bought cars. She blamed me for the cars — and the house being too big. We had a rough time," he acknowledged. "But I think we have gotten over that."
Until Christmas, when she plans to join him, Mrs. Martin continues to work as a substitute teacher with autistic children at an Adirondacks elementary school: a $12,000-a-year job she loves in a place she says she is hesitant to leave. With their younger daughter, she has moved into a smaller building on their big property.
A lively woman who loves bike riding and horses, she has built a close network of friends. "What is the place in Kansas like?" she asked a reporter with some trepidation before her first visit at Thanksgiving.
Mr. Martin, who moved to Kansas last April, brought the couple's 13-year-old son, Edward, to join him in the fall. He has been counting the days until his wife and Sophia, 9, come permanently. The older daughter, Mrs. Martin's from a previous marriage, has found work in Florida after finishing high school.
In the meantime, Mr. Martin is also overseeing a one-acre vineyard beside the Oregon Trail Road, drawing on his knowledge of the wine industry from his California days.
He does what he can to lessen the family strains.
"I have a temper. I have to control my temper," he said. "I could drink like a fish, but if you have problems in your life, drinking does not help."
And he recites a quotation he holds dear : "The measure of a man is not whether he falls down, but whether he gets up again." Still, Mr. Martin is prone to ruminate over the loss of so much money. He is furious at the banks and the bankers, who he thinks gave him bad advice, and he still sounds angry at his brother and others who decided to sell the company and who he says gave him little voice. Some of them got more than $100 million each, he said, while he got $14 million, as did his father and his sister Ann, because they were all minority shareholders.
His brother-in-law David Weyrich said that if Mr. Martin had objections to the sale, he did not voice them.
Mrs. Martin says she believes the move from California was motivated in part because he resented his brother and brother-in-law's bigger role in the community.
She also speculates that the Adirondacks estate was alluring partly as a way of keeping up. "I think he wanted to show his brother and brother-in-law that he had a big home, too," she said over dinner recently in Saratoga Springs, N.Y.
Mr. Martin disagreed. "We are Irish Catholics, and we thought it would be a compound for our family over generations," he said. After the cramped rooms at their house in England, he liked the big rooms, he said. "Sometimes, things don't work out."
___ 

Extra Post: "India district bans cell phones for unmarried women"

Article about a traditional caste social system that places heavy controls on the behaviors of females.  Males are not controlled or sanctioned as harshly.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20101124/tc_afp/lifestyleindiatelecommarriage
– Wed Nov 24, 1:21 am ET
NEW DELHI (AFP) – A local council in northern India has banned unmarried women from carrying mobile telephones to halt a series of illicit romances between partners from different castes, media reports said Wednesday.
The Baliyan council in Uttar Pradesh state decided to act after at least 23 young couples ran away and got married over the last year against their parents' wishes.
"The panchayat (assembly) was convinced that the couples planned their elopement over their cell phones," village elder Jatin Raghuvanshi told the Calcutta Telegraph.
The rules of inter-caste marriages are complicated and extremely rigid in many rural communities in India, with some lovers even murdered in "honour killings" by relatives trying to protect their family's reputation.
"All parents were told to ensure their unmarried daughters do not use cell phones. The boys can do so, but only under their parents' monitoring," said Satish Tyagi, a spokesman for the village assembly.
Caste discrimination is banned in India but still pervades many aspects of daily life, especially outside the cities.
Traditional Hindu society breaks down into brahmins (priests and scholars), kshatriya (soldiers), vaishya (merchants) and shudra (labourers). Below the caste system are the Dalits, formerly known as "Untouchables".
Caste categories often determine Indians' life prospects, and conservative families will only marry within their own caste sub-division.

Extra Post: "Flirting can be more than fun, researchers say"

Very interesting article about our social construction of reality.  I took the quiz at the end of the article--very interesting perspective.  I'd like to know more about how they defined each of the categories, and the info/sources they used to write their questions.


"Flirting can be more than fun, researchers say"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101115/od_nm/us_usa_flirting_odd

KANSAS CITY, Kansas (Reuters) – There is a lot more to flirting than fun, according to a new research study that says finding success in romance depends in part on understanding your own personal "flirting style."
Whether or not you prefer sidling up to a stranger in a bar or you'd rather sit back and wait for an object of attraction to approach are distinctions that once recognized can help people navigate the rocky seas of relationships, according to Jeffrey Hall, assistant professor of communication studies at the University of Kansas.
Hall recently completed a study into styles of flirting among dating adults, surveying more than 5,100 people regarding their methods of communicating romantic interest.
"Knowing something about the way you communicate attraction says something about challenges you might have had in your past dating life," Hall said. "Hopefully, this awareness can help people avoid those mistakes and succeed in courtship."
Hall said there are essentially five styles of flirting: physical, traditional, polite, sincere and playful.
In physical flirting, people express their sexual interest in a potential partner and, he says, often quickly can develop the relationships, have more sexual chemistry and have a greater emotional connection to their partners.
Traditional flirts tend to believe that men should make the first moves, with women assuming more passive roles. Both sexes comfortable with this style seem to prefer more "intimate" dating scenes,, he said.
There are many people whose flirting styles fall into the category of "playful" and are aimed largely at enhancing their own self-esteem, Hall said. These people are less likely to have lasting and meaningful relationships, he added.
"In some ways, the very early part of developing relationships is important to the success of long-term relationships, including marriages," he said.
Hall co-authored the article with Steve Carter, senior director of research and product development at online dating site eHarmony.com; and other researchers.
Take the quiz: http://connect.ku.edu/tests/flirt/. (Reporting by Carey Gillam)

Week 12 Post: Human Trafficking in Southeast United States



In Tucson, there is a road called “Miracle Mile” that connects to I-10, running at a diagonal to the major roads on the South East side of town.  30 years ago, that strip of road was full of hotels and motels, lodges and tourists traps.  Now, most of it lies vacant and boarded up, crouching behind locked chain-link fences and littered parking lots.  Close to the intersection of Oracle Road and Miracle Mile is the “No-Tel Mo-Tel”, that advertises “Rooms by the Hour” and “Wa-Wa Beds”.  I passed this intersection every day going to work, and began to recognize the walks, if not the faces, of women who were “getting off shift,” going to the bus stops.  This time of day, I never saw young girls, only older-looking women.  At the time, I never thought about if I could help those women change those circumstances, as I was so caught up in my own life. 

Tucson is only a few hours away from the Mexican border and high numbers of illegal immigrants provide an unending supply for local domestic, labor, and sex markets.  Undocumented workers are cheap, don’t require paperwork, and disappear easily.   Human coyotes make enormous profits from smuggling people across the Mexican border into the United States.  Those people are almost always poor, and have left behind their entire family or support system.  It is relatively easy to keep these people in a prison of social isolation, sometimes in conditions akin to slavery.

Society has a hard time differentiating between “illegal aliens” and victims of human slavery.  There are programs and resources available for victims of slavery, if only they can learn about them, and if only society can reach out to help them.  I don’t think the solution is to deport everyone who entered illegally, especially those who are victims of abuse or kidnapping, and I don’t think it’s fair to send people back to the same situations that drove them to leave their country in the first place.

Solutions:
1) I would educate and empower men, women, and children, to rise above abusive cultural norms. 
2) People would take responsibility to reach out to those who might be vulnerable or in distress, and help them find the resources they need.  Raising public awareness and social responsibility through public outreach, the media, and grassroots organizations.
3) I would rid economies and governments of economic exploitation.  I’m not sure how to do this, and I’m not interested in fighting over logistics, and the merits of capitalism vs socialism and communism.
4) I’m not sure what to do with those who abuse and traffic in human lives.  At the moment, it’s not pleasant, and highly unprofessional. 
5) Find ways to recognize and reach out to victims, through advocacy groups, using funds raised and allocated for counseling, rehabilitation, and retraining.
Where is the respect of life, if you abuse your children?  I would really like to understand better the mentality and culture that lives in slavery like that, and perpetuates it.  And then, how to change and eradicate it.

I found the following sites useful:
www.humantrafficking.org  (this one has a big index of articles, sites, and posts)
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5201813 “Tracking the Child Sex Trade in Southeast Asia” NPR’s interview with Nicholas Khristof)

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Week 9: Crime and Deviance-Does the punishment fit the crime?

The icon of Justice is a blindfolded woman carrying a double-edged sword and scales: the blindfold is show objectivity, the sword represents the power of justice, and the scales represent the balanced arguments of each side.  Who decides what is and is not crime?  Who decides who is and is not a criminal?  How can the community ensure that the legal and judicial systems are not punitively targeting a specific demographic? In " Study Settles It: Shocking Black & Latino Imprisonment Rates the Result of Racist, Punitive Impulse", the criminalization of minorities in the American penal system is appalling.  The numbers show a systemic targeting of specific racial classes, that helps perpetuate cultural stereotypes.  One researcher calls it “similar to the Jim Crow [segregation] laws.” 

Normally we leave trials, sentencing and punishment of criminals to the judicial system, and most of us assume that one is “innocent until proven guilty”, and that “justice always prevails.”  Thanks largely to popular crime and legal drama television, most of us assume the judicial system is inherently fair and impersonal, imposing punishment on those convicted, and releasing the innocent.  However, many who enter the judicial system understand that one’s social, economic, and racial classes are as important as one’s attorney and PR team. 
What happens when a judge is inconsistent with his sentencing for two individuals, where the defendants’ social and racial classes appear to influence the punishments?  How can we hold judges accountable for these discrepancies within our society?

How do we address this problem of criminalization of targeted racial groups?  Some suggestions from "Confronting the New Faces of Hate: Hate Crimes in America 2009", and “The Study Settles It”  include greater community activism for civil rights, supporting education programs and training initiatives, and more funding for law enforcement to raise awareness of prejudice within their organizations, and to better respond to these types of crimes.

Professor Felton Earls of the Harvard School of Public Health talks about the “cohesion” of communities in his talk with Susan Stamberg on NPR, “Crime Study Challenges Past Assumptions.”  According to Earls, cohesion is created by communities being invested in each other’s lives, especially the lives of children and teenagers.  My main concern is this: how to fund these programs, and implement them in communities. 


Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Week 8 Blog: Milgram Then, and Now

"All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing." By Sir Edmund Burke

Milgram's obedience experiments are notorious and controversial in both their scope and conclusions. Many people have declared that they "would stop the experiment".  However, this statement comes AFTER they have learnt of the experiment, and without experiencing the conditions set up to ensure compliance.  In the debriefing stage, some 'Teacher' participants justified continuing because they were able to abrogate responsibility, or felt pressure from an 'expert' who seemed to be in control and was not concerned about the cries of the 'Learner.'   In the video " Milgram Study Today " on MySocLab, one 'Teacher' participant said he continued because he was "just doing my job", and he thought the 'Learner' would be able to free himself 'if he were really in the that much pain".  However, I consider that statement to be rationalization of his actions.  Other Teacher participants also claim the presence of the 'expert' or 'authority figure' ensured their compliance: our society focuses on obeying authority figures and 'experts', including regulatory commissions, federal agencies, etc.  Even with accomplices that act as a moral guide, saying they would not continue the experiment, most participants (about 70%) still finished administering the shocks.  


With the scandals of Abu Ghraib prison, and Guantanamo Bay Prison still lingering, it's easier to see why people fall into authority roles, even when those roles include behavior that is dangerous or harmful to themselves and others.  From what I understand, those military prisons had medical authorities that supervised torture/interrogations, and the prison officials had permission to continue their activities from the highest military and civil authority.  Many war criminals brought to court have said they "were just following orders."  I know the military heavily sanctions those who question authority, to prevent a breakdown of the organization.

These situations continue because as humans, we still crave structure, power, and acceptance.  I believe that a 'mob mentality' brings people to do things that they would not normally ever consider doing.  Milton's experiments are still very relevant today; human nature hasn't really changed very much.We like to believe that we are civilized, rational beings in complete control of ourselves and our emotions.  However, we see that evil still proliferates in this world, especially when people do nothing to oppose it, or organize against it. 

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Week 6 BLOG ASSIGNMENT: Television and Socialization


Critics often charge that television's portrayal of violent and sexual themes powerfully affects its viewers, especially children. How much of a role do you think TV plays in the socialization process? Does it affect everyone to the same extent? Post your positions in your blog and defend your positions.

I think TV plays an enormous part in the socialization process.  It plays an important part in how children and adolescents learn to relate with one another, and society. Television helps to shape their ideas for games and fantasies, and directs them to products, books, or movies.  Ever since World War II, television has become the primary communicator of pop culture and mass media to everyone with a television set.  Children, adolescents, and young adults can bond over shared tv shows, characters, reality stars, etc.  People judge each other by what shows they watch.  I think TV affects everyone to the extent they watch it.  If you don’t watch it as much, you aren’t as affected, although you will still see its influence.  We are educated by TV, whether for product placement, or political goings-on, the weather, community activities, etc.  Children are very impressionable, and imitate what they see around them, playing out the dynamics and roles they observe.  This includes roleplaying, including ‘house’, ‘teacher’, ‘fireman’, and various heroes and villains.  Usually from stories they’ve read or seen.  They really identify, and transpose the characters onto themselves, feeling it is absolutely real.  They also observe their parents and other adults around them reacting to what’s on TV.  It’s how we learn what is funny, inappropriate, smart, or sarcastic.  Our opinions are formed by what we see our social group responding to. 
I remember watching a documentary segment in class about young girls’ responses to Disney heroines, and trying to imitate their costumes, voices, movements, and situations.  One mother was very concerned that her daughter kept pulling the straps of her swimsuit down around her shoulders because it was ‘pretty like Jasmine’ in the movie Aladdin. With many concerned about “age compression”, or a “hurried childhood”, and the fashion industry’s increased focus on younger children, it’s no wonder that parents and others express concerns about kids becoming older, younger.  Television plays an important role here, as well.  Advertisements and celebrity endorsements introduce watchers to the latest trends, and create hype around the most fashionable “it” items. (Macionis 112-124)
 There is a lot of research on this topic, and I would love to investigate this topic more a later time.  What do YOU think?